WWW.ABSTRACT.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstract, dissertation, book
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 |

«Frederick Engels Socialism: Utopian and Scientific I [The Development of Utopian Socialism] Modern Socialism is, in its essence, the direct product ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (Chpt. 1) Page 1 of 12

Frederick Engels

Socialism: Utopian and Scientific

I

[The Development of Utopian

Socialism]

Modern Socialism is, in its essence, the direct product of the recognition, on the one hand,

of the class antagonisms existing in the society of today between proprietors and nonproprietors, between capitalists and wage-workers; on the other hand, of the anarchy existing

in production. But, in its theoretical form, modern Socialism originally appears ostensibly as a more logical extension of the principles laid down by the great French philosophers of the 18th century. Like every new theory, modern Socialism had, at first, to connect itself with the intellectual stock-in-trade ready to its hand, however deeply its roots lay in material economic facts.

The great men, who in France prepared men’s minds for the coming revolution, were themselves extreme revolutionists. They recognized no external authority of any kind whatever. Religion, natural science, society, political institutions – everything was subjected to the most unsparing criticism: everything must justify its existence before the judgmentseat of reason or give up existence. Reason became the sole measure of everything. It was the time when, as Hegel says, the world stood upon its head [1]; first in the sense that the human head, and the principles arrived at by its thought, claimed to be the basis of all human action and association; but by and by, also, in the wider sense that the reality which was in contradiction to these principles had, in fact, to be turned upside down. Every form of society and government then existing, every old traditional notion, was flung into the lumber-room as irrational; the world had hitherto allowed itself to be led solely by prejudices; everything in the past deserved only pity and contempt. Now, for the first time, appeared the light of day, the kingdom of reason; henceforth superstition, injustice, privilege, oppression, were to be superseded by eternal truth, eternal Right, equality based on Nature and the inalienable rights of man.

We know today that this kingdom of reason was nothing more than the idealized kingdom of the bourgeoisie; that this eternal Right found its realization in bourgeois justice; that this http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/ch01.htm 5/12/2010 Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (Chpt. 1) Page 2 of 12 equality reduced itself to bourgeois equality before the law; that bourgeois property was proclaimed as one of the essential rights of man; and that the government of reason, the Contrat Social of Rousseau, came into being, and only could come into being, as a democratic bourgeois republic. The great thinkers of the 18th century could, no more than their predecessors, go beyond the limits imposed upon them by their epoch.

But, side by side with the antagonisms of the feudal nobility and the burghers, who claimed to represent all the rest of society, was the general antagonism of exploiters and exploited, of rich idlers and poor workers. It was this very circumstance that made it possible for the representatives of the bourgeoisie to put themselves forward as representing not one special class, but the whole of suffering humanity. Still further. From its origin the bourgeoisie was saddled with its antithesis: capitalists cannot exist without wage-workers, and, in the same proportion as the mediaeval burgher of the guild developed into the modern bourgeois, the guild journeyman and the day-laborer, outside the guilds, developed into the proletarian. And although, upon the whole, the bourgeoisie, in their struggle with the nobility, could claim to represent at the same time the interests of the different workingclasses of that period, yet in every great bourgeois movement there were independent outbursts of that class which was the forerunner, more or less developed, of the modern proletariat. For example, at the time of the German Reformation and the Peasants’ War, the Anabaptists and Thomas Münzer; in the great English Revolution, the Levellers; in the great French Revolution, Babeuf.

These were theoretical enunciations, corresponding with these revolutionary uprisings of a class not yet developed; in the 16th and 17th centuries, Utopian pictures of ideal social conditions; in the 18th century, actual communistic theories (Morelly and Mably)[2]. The demand for equality was no longer limited to political rights; it was extended also to the social conditions of individuals. It was not simply class privileges that were to be abolished, but class distinctions themselves. A Communism, ascetic, denouncing all the pleasures of

life, Spartan, was the first form of the new teaching. Then came the three great Utopians:

Saint-Simon, to whom the middle-class movement, side by side with the proletarian, still had a certain significance; Fourier; and Owen, who in the country where capitalist production was most developed, and under the influence of the antagonisms begotten of this, worked out his proposals for the removal of class distinction systematically and in direct relation to French materialism.

One thing is common to all three. Not one of them appears as a representative of the interests of that proletariat which historical development had, in the meantime, produced.

Like the French philosophers, they do not claim to emancipate a particular class to begin with, but all humanity at once. Like them, they wish to bring in the kingdom of reason and

–  –  –





eternal justice, but this kingdom, as they see it, is as far as Heaven from Earth, from that of the French philosophers.

For, to our three social reformers, the bourgeois world, based upon the principles of these philosophers, is quite as irrational and unjust, and, therefore, finds its way to the dust-hole quite as readily as feudalism and all the earlier stages of society. If pure reason and justice have not, hitherto, ruled the world, this has been the case only because men have not rightly understood them. What was wanted was the individual man of genius, who has now arisen and who understands the truth. That he has now arisen, that the truth has now been clearly understood, is not an inevitable event, following of necessity in the chains of historical development, but a mere happy accident. He might just as well have been born 500 years earlier, and might then have spared humanity 500 years of error, strife, and suffering.

We saw how the French philosophers of the 18th century, the forerunners of the Revolution, appealed to reason as the sole judge of all that is. A rational government, rational society, were to be founded; everything that ran counter to eternal reason was to be remorselessly done away with. We saw also that this eternal reason was in reality nothing but the idealized understanding of the 18th century citizen, just then evolving into the bourgeois. The French Revolution had realized this rational society and government.

But the new order of things, rational enough as compared with earlier conditions, turned out to be by no means absolutely rational. The state based upon reason completely collapsed.

Rousseau’s Contrat Social had found its realization in the Reign of Terror, from which the bourgeoisie, who had lost confidence in their own political capacity, had taken refuge first in the corruption of the Directorate, and, finally, under the wing of the Napoleonic despotism.

The promised eternal peace was turned into an endless war of conquest. The society based upon reason had fared no better. The antagonism between rich and poor, instead of dissolving into general prosperity, had become intensified by the removal of the guild and other privileges, which had to some extent bridged it over, and by the removal of the charitable institutions of the Church. The “freedom of property” from feudal fetters, now veritably accomplished, turned out to be, for the small capitalists and small proprietors, the freedom to sell their small property, crushed under the overmastering competition of the large capitalists and landlords, to these great lords, and thus, as far as the small capitalists and peasant proprietors were concerned, became “freedom from property”. The development of industry upon a capitalistic basis made poverty and misery of the working masses conditions of existence of society. Cash payment became more and more, in Carlyle’s phrase [See Thomas Carlyle, Past and Present, London 1843], the sole nexus between man and man. The number of crimes increased from year to year. Formerly, the feudal vices had openly stalked about in broad daylight; though not eradicated, they were now at any rate http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/ch01.htm 5/12/2010 Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (Chpt. 1) Page 4 of 12 thrust into the background. In their stead, the bourgeois vices, hitherto practiced in secret, began to blossom all the more luxuriantly. Trade became to a greater and greater extent cheating. The “fraternity” of the revolutionary motto was realized in the chicanery and rivalries of the battle of competition. Oppression by force was replaced by corruption; the sword, as the first social lever, by gold. The right of the first night was transferred from the feudal lords to the bourgeois manufacturers. Prostitution increased to an extent never heard of. Marriage itself remained, as before, the legally recognized form, the official cloak of prostitution, and, moreover, was supplemented by rich crops of adultery.

In a word, compared with the splendid promises of the philosophers, the social and political institutions born of the “triumph of reason” were bitterly disappointing caricatures.

All that was wanting was the men to formulate this disappointment, and they came with the turn of the century. In 1802, Saint-Simon’s Geneva letters appeared; in 1808 appeared Fourier’s first work, although the groundwork of his theory dated from 1799; on January 1, 1800, Robert Owen undertook the direction of New Lanark.

At this time, however, the capitalist mode of production, and with it the antagonism between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, was still very incompletely developed. Modern Industry, which had just arisen in England, was still unknown in France. But Modern Industry develops, on the one hand, the conflicts which make absolutely necessary a revolution in the mode of production, and the doing away with its capitalistic character – conflicts not only between the classes begotten of it, but also between the very productive forces and the forms of exchange created by it. And, on the other hand, it develops, in these very gigantic productive forces, the means of ending these conflicts. If, therefore, about the year 1800, the conflicts arising from the new social order were only just beginning to take shape, this holds still more fully as to the means of ending them. The “have-nothing” masses of Paris, during the Reign of Terror, were able for a moment to gain the mastery, and thus to lead the bourgeois revolution to victory in spite of the bourgeoisie themselves. But, in doing so, they only proved how impossible it was for their domination to last under the conditions then obtaining. The proletariat, which then for the first time evolved itself from these “havenothing” masses as the nucleus of a new class, as yet quite incapable of independent political action, appeared as an oppressed, suffering order, to whom, in its incapacity to help itself, help could, at best, be brought in from without or down from above.

This historical situation also dominated the founders of Socialism. To the crude conditions of capitalistic production and the crude class conditions correspond crude theories. The solution of the social problems, which as yet lay hidden in undeveloped economic conditions, the Utopians attempted to evolve out of the human brain. Society presented nothing but wrongs; to remove these was the task of reason. It was necessary, then, to http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/ch01.htm 5/12/2010 Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (Chpt. 1) Page 5 of 12 discover a new and more perfect system of social order and to impose this upon society from without by propaganda, and, wherever it was possible, by the example of model experiments. These new social systems were foredoomed as Utopian; the more completely they were worked out in detail, the more they could not avoid drifting off into pure phantasies.

These facts once established, we need not dwell a moment longer upon this side of the question, now wholly belonging to the past. We can leave it to the literary small fry to solemnly quibble over these phantasies, which today only make us smile, and to crow over the superiority of their own bald reasoning, as compared with such “insanity”. For ourselves, we delight in the stupendously grand thoughts and germs of thought that everywhere break out through their phantastic covering, and to which these Philistines are blind.

Saint-Simon was a son of the great French Revolution, at the outbreak of which he was not yet 30. The Revolution was the victory of the 3rd estate – i.e., of the great masses of the nation, working in production and in trade, over the privileged idle classes, the nobles and the priests. But the victory of the 3rd estate soon revealed itself as exclusively the victory of a smaller part of this “estate”, as the conquest of political power by the socially privileged section of it – i.e., the propertied bourgeoisie. And the bourgeoisie had certainly developed rapidly during the Revolution, partly by speculation in the lands of the nobility and of the Church, confiscated and afterwards put up for sale, and partly by frauds upon the nation by means of army contracts. It was the domination of these swindlers that, under the Directorate, brought France to the verge of ruin, and thus gave Napoleon the pretext for his coup d’état.



Pages:   || 2 | 3 |


Similar works:

«Language and Framework Support for Reviewably-Secure Software Systems by Adrian Matthew Mettler A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor David Wagner, Chair Professor Deirdre Mulligan Professor Dawn Song Fall 2012 Language and Framework Support for Reviewably-Secure Software Systems Copyright 2012 by Adrian...»

«ACTA UNIVERSITATIS PALACKIANAE OLOMUCENSIS FAKULTAS PHILOSOPHICA PHILOSOPHICA – AESTHETICA 28 – 2005 ACTA UNIVERSITATIS PALACKIANAE OLOMUCENSIS FACULTAS PHILOSOPHICA PHILOSOPHICA – AESTHETICA 28 – 2005 MUSICOLOGICA OLOMUCENSIA VII Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Olomouc 2005 The present volume was submitted to print on 6 April 2005. Dieser Band wurde am 6. April 2005 in Druck gegeben. Předáno do tisku 6. dubna 2005. The authors are responsible for the content and the linguistic...»

«LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION IN HOMER’S ODYSSEY by Benjamin Stephen Haller B.A., The College of William and Mary, 1997 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 2001 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Benjamin Stephen Haller It was defended on May 14, 2007 and approved by Dr. Dennis Looney, Chair, Department...»

«A VERLAG KARL ALBER Wittgenstein schrieb sein Leben lang über Musik und Musiker, die er schätzte oder auch ablehnte. Musik war ihm dabei nicht nur die liebste aller Künste, die detailliert mit Freunden und Verwandten besprochen wurde, sondern immer wieder auch Gegenstand philosophischen Nachdenkens. Dieses Buch widmet sich einer Herausarbeitung der in den Werken Ludwig Wittgensteins implizit vorhandenen Musikphilosophie. Dabei werden die zahlreichen und weit verstreuten Aphorismen zur Musik...»

«FOREST HARVEST SETTING DESIGN EVALUATION INCORPORATING LOGGERS' PREFERENCE. A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY University of Washington Approved By (Chair of Supervisory Committee) Program Authorized To Offer Degree Date Doctoral Dissertation In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctoral degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall I further agree that...»

«PROGRESS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTICOMPONENT REACTIONS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Hoang Van Le August 2013 © 2013 Hoang Van Le PROGRESS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTICOMPONENT REACTIONS Hoang Van Le, Ph.D. Cornell University 2013 Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) are processes in which three or more reactants are combined in one pot to form products that...»

«A Computational Aeroelasticity Framework for Analyzing Flapping Wings by Satish Kumar Chimakurthi A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Aerospace Engineering) in The University of Michigan Doctoral Committee: Professor Carlos E.S. Cesnik, Co-Chair Professor Wei Shyy, Co-Chair Professor Peretz P. Friedmann Associate Professor Bogdan I. Epureanu Senior Research Engineer Raymond E. Gordnier Satish Kumar Chimakurthi 2009 c All...»

«Epistemic game theory∗ Eddie Dekel and Marciano Siniscalchi Tel Aviv and Northwestern University, and Northwestern University January 14, 2014 Contents 1 Introduction and Motivation 2 1.1 Philosophy/Methodology................................. 4 2 Main ingredients 5 2.1 Notation........................................... 5 2.2 Strategic-form games.......................................»

«artificial presence the image between sign and mirror review of: Lambert Wiesing: Artifizielle Präsenz Studien zur Philosophie des Bildes Suhrkamp 2005 See also my reviews of Nelson Goodman, Arthur Danto, W.J.T. Mitchell, Gottfried Boehm PDF-version INTRODUCTION In 2005, Lambert Wiesing published a series of studies, in which he distances himself from the semiotic approach of the image, from a phenomenological point of view. The key concept is the 'artifizielle Präsenz' (artificial presence)...»

«CATALAN SOCIAL SCIENCES REVIEW, 1: 46-57 (2012) Secció de Filosofia i Ciències Socials, IEC, Barcelona DOI: 10.2436/20.3000.02.4 http://revistes.iec.cat/index/CSSr Cartography, landscape and territory1 Vicenç M. Rosselló i Verger* Universitat de València Original source: Treballs de la Societat Catalana de Geografia, 65: 35-49 (2008) (http://scg.iec.cat) Translated from Catalan by Mary Black Abstract: The word landscape is fashionable. It has become thoroughly modern and triggers heated...»

«1 Socrates Talks to Himself in Plato’s Hippias Major1 Halsten Olson §1 Socrates Meets His Match At Last It is almost a rule that the mature Socrates of Plato’s puzzle-raising dialogues never converses with a philosophical equal. But it is not quite a rule: the exception is an ongoing conversation with himself of which Socrates gives us fragments in the Hippias Major.2 From the fragments we learn that in talking to himself, Socrates is, while of course his own equal, also his own superior...»

«An Empirical Examination of the Outcome Effects of Downsizing on Decision Makers. by Barry Wright A thesis submitted to the Department of Management in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen's University Kingston, Ontario March, 1999 Copyright @ Barry Wright m*m Bibliothèque nationale National Library du Canada of Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services seMces bibliographiques 395, rue Wellington 395 Wellington Street Ottawa ON K IA...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.abstract.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Abstract, dissertation, book

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.