WWW.ABSTRACT.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstract, dissertation, book
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«October 2013 Contents A. Introduction 3 B. Allegations 4 C. Preliminary applications 4 D. Summary of evidence 4 Documents 4 Witnesses 4 E. Decision ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Mr Ashley Stuart

Farquharson:

Professional Conduct

Panel outcome

Panel decision and reasons on behalf of the

Secretary of State for Education

October 2013

Contents

A. Introduction 3

B. Allegations 4

C. Preliminary applications 4

D. Summary of evidence 4

Documents 4 Witnesses 4 E. Decision and reasons 4 Panel’s recommendation to the Secretary of State 7 Decision and reasons on behalf of the Secretary of State 9 Professional Conduct Panel decision and recommendations, and decision on behalf of the Secretary of State Teacher: Mr Ashley Stuart Farquharson Teacher ref no: 0856835 Teacher date of birth: 22 August 1980 NCTL Case ref no: 10296 Date of Determination: 28 October 2013 Former employer: Denefield School A. Introduction A Professional Conduct Panel (“the Panel”) of the National College for Teaching and Leadership (“the National College”) convened on 28 October 2013 at 53-55 Butts Road, Earlsdon Park, Coventry, CV1 3BH to consider the case of Mr Ashley Stuart Farquharson.

The Panel members were Martin Pilkington (Lay Panellist– in the Chair), Judith Barton (Teacher Panellist) and Colin Parker (Teacher Panellist).

The Legal Adviser to the Panel was Luisa Gibbons of Eversheds LLP Solicitors.

The Presenting Officer for the National College was Louisa Atkin of Browne Jacobson LLP Solicitors. The Presenting Officer was not present as this was a Meeting of the Professional Conduct Panel, rather than a Hearing.

Mr Farquharson was not present and was not represented.

The Meeting took place in private. The decision as to facts and unacceptable professional conduct and/ or conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute was announced in public and was recorded.

B. Allegations The Panel considered the allegation set out in the Notice of Meeting of 3 October 2013.

This alleged that Mr Farquharson was guilty of unacceptable professional conduct/ conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute, in that whilst employed at Denefield School, Reading, he developed an inappropriate relationship with Student A and engaged in sexual intercourse with her and that in doing so, he failed to maintain the proper professional boundaries expected of a teacher.

Mr Farquharson admitted the facts of the allegations and further confirmed that the admitted facts amounted to unacceptable professional conduct and conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute.

C. Preliminary applications There were no preliminary applications.

D. Summary of evidence Documents

Inadvance of the hearing, the Panel received a bundle of documents which included:

–  –  –

The Panel Members confirmed that they had read all of the documents in advance of the Meeting.

Witnesses Convened as a meeting, the Panel heard no oral evidence.

E. Decision and reasons

The Panel announced its decision and reasons as follows:

We have now carefully considered the case before us and have reached a decision.

We confirm that we have read all the documents provided in the bundle in advance of the hearing.

Summary of Evidence A Statement of Agreed Facts had been signed by Mr Farquharson on 20 September 2013 and by the Presenting Officer on 25 September 2013. The Statement of Agreed Facts confirmed that Mr Farquharson admitted all of the alleged facts. Furthermore, Mr Farquharson confirmed that the admitted facts amounted to unacceptable professional conduct and conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute.

Findings of Fact

Our findings of fact are as follows:

We have found the following particulars of the allegation against Mr Farquharson proven,

for these reasons:

1 Whilst employed at Denefield School, Reading, Mr Farquharson developed an inappropriate relationship with Student A and engaged in sexual intercourse with her. In doing so, he failed to maintain the proper professional boundaries expected of a teacher.

On 20 August 2013, Mr Farquharson returned a Notice of Referral Form admitting the allegations set out in the Notice of Referral. He further confirmed that the admitted facts amounted to unacceptable professional conduct and/ or conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute. He requested that the allegations be considered without a hearing. That request was granted and confirmed by letter from the National College dated 3 October 2013.

The Panel have in their hearing bundle at pages 10 – 12 a Statement of Agreed Facts signed by Mr Farquharson on the 20 September 2013 and by the Presenting Officer on 25 September 2013.

The Statement of Agreed Facts confirmed that Student A was a vulnerable student who was at risk of self harm. In December 2011 Mr Farquharson received an email from Student A in which she told him that she had feelings for him. He reported this to the school and was advised that he should not provide pastoral support to Student A and that any academic work should be done publicly. In December 2012, Mr Farquharson happened to meet Student A whilst he was out in the town centre. They had a conversation and subsequently developed a personal relationship,. Mr Farquharson met with Student A to go out in his car. Mr Farquharson accepts that he had sexual intercourse with Student A on around 6 occasions between January 2013 and the beginning of March 2013.





The allegation is admitted and therefore found proved.

Findings as to Unacceptable Professional Conduct and/or Conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute In the Statement of Agreed Facts, Mr Farquharson admitted that his conduct amounted to unacceptable professional conduct and conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute.

The Panel is satisfied that the conduct of Mr Farquharson in relation to the facts that we have found proved, involved breaches of the Teachers’ Standards. We consider that by

reference to Part Two Mr Farquharson is in breach of the following standards:

 Upholding public trust in the profession and maintain high standards of ethics and behaviour, within and outside school, by Treating pupils with dignity, building relationships rooted in mutual respect, and at all times observing proper boundaries appropriate to a teacher’s professional position;

Having regard for the need to safeguard pupils’ well-being, in accordance with the statutory provisions.

 Teachers must have proper and professional regard for the ethos, policies and practices of the school in which they teach, and maintain high standards in their own attendance and punctuality.

 Teachers must have an understanding of, and always act within, the statutory frameworks which set out their professional duties and responsibilities.

The Panel is satisfied that the conduct of Mr Farquharson fell significantly short of the standards expected of the profession.

The Panel notes that the conduct admitted took place outside of the education setting, and exposed a vulnerable student to behaviour which potentially could have been harmful. Accordingly, the Panel is satisfied that Mr Farquharson is guilty of unacceptable professional conduct.

The Panel has taken into account how the teaching profession is viewed by others and considered the influence that teachers may have on pupils, parents and others in the community. The Panel therefore finds that Mr Farquharson’s actions constitute conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute. The findings of misconduct are serious, and are directly related to his suitability to be a teacher.

Panel’s recommendation to the Secretary of State Given the Panel’s findings in respect of unacceptable professional conduct and conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute, it is necessary for the Panel to go on to consider whether it would be appropriate to recommend the imposition of a Prohibition Order by the Secretary of State.

In considering whether to recommend to the Secretary of State that a Prohibition Order should be made, the Panel has to consider whether it is a proportionate measure, and whether it is in the public interest to do so. Prohibition Orders should not be given in order to be punitive, or to show that blame has been apportioned, although they are likely to have a punitive effect.

The Panel has examined the particular public interest considerations set out in the Teacher Misconduct – Prohibition of Teachers Advice and having done so has found a number of them to be relevant in this case, namely  the protection of children  the maintenance of public confidence in the profession  declaring and upholding proper standards of conduct.

In light of the Panel’s findings against Mr Farquharson, which involved serious findings of having a sexual relationship with a vulnerable student, there is a strong public interest consideration in respect of the protection of children.

The Panel found that Mr Farquharson’s conduct is outside that which can be tolerated.

The Panel considers that public confidence in the profession could be seriously weakened if conduct such as that found against Mr Farquharson is not treated with the utmost seriousness when regulating the conduct of the profession.

Proportionality Notwithstanding the clear public interest considerations that were present, the Panel considered carefully whether or not it would be proportionate to impose a Prohibition Order taking into account the effect that this would have on Mr Farquharson. In forming a judgement in this respect, the Panel took particular account of the mitigation evidence that was presented to it by Mr Farquharson in a written submission. The Panel noted that Mr Farquharson has acknowledged that his conduct was unequivocally a dismissal matter and one for the police to consider, and that “both of these things happened is the only responsible course of action for the respective decision makers”. The Panel noted the difficulties that Mr Farquharson has described he was experiencing at the school and his history of health issues. The Panel has also taken into account the expressions of love that Mr Farquharson has expressed for Student A. The Panel was also mindful of the fact that prior to these findings being made against him, Mr Farquharson was considered to be a person of good character with only a caution in respect of the acts that are the subject of these allegations against him. However, the Panel was concerned that Mr Farquharson failed to demonstrate insight as to the potentially harmful nature of the relationship on a vulnerable pupil or any remorse beyond recognising it to be professionally inappropriate.

The Guidance

In carrying out the balancing exercise the Panel has considered the public interest factors both in favour of and against prohibition, as well as the interests of Mr Farquharson. The Panel took further account of the Teacher Misconduct – Prohibition of Teachers Advice, which suggests that a prohibition order may be appropriate if certain behaviours of a teacher have been proven. From the list of such behaviours, the Panel has found the

following to be relevant:

 serious departure from the personal and professional conduct elements of the latest teachers’ standards;

 misconduct seriously affecting the education and/or well being of pupils, and particularly where there is a continuing risk;

 abuse of position/trust (particularly involving vulnerable pupils) or violation of the rights of pupils;

 sustained or serious bullying, or other deliberate behaviour that undermines the profession, the school or colleagues.

Even though there were behaviours that would point to a Prohibition Order being appropriate, the Panel went on to consider whether or not there were sufficient mitigating factors to militate against a Prohibition Order being an appropriate and proportionate measure to impose. The Panel finds that Mr Farquharson’s actions were deliberate, that he was not acting under duress, but that he had a previously good record.

The Panel is of the view that Prohibition is both proportionate and appropriate. We have decided that the public interest considerations and safeguarding concerns outweigh the interests of Mr Farquharson. Accordingly, the Panel makes a recommendation to the Secretary of State that a Prohibition Order should be imposed with immediate effect.

The Panel was mindful that the Teacher Misconduct – Prohibition of Teachers Guidance advises that a Prohibition Order applies for life, but there may be circumstances in any given case that may make it appropriate to allow a teacher to apply to have the prohibition order reviewed after a specified period of time that may not be less than two years.

The Teacher Misconduct – Prohibition of Teachers Advice indicates that there are behaviours that, if proven, would militate against a review period being recommended.

One of these behaviours include serious sexual misconduct. The panel considers this to be a serious case of sexual misconduct with a vulnerable pupil. The need for protection of pupils in the future indicates a situation in which a review period would not be appropriate. As such, it has decided that it would be proportionate in all the circumstances for the Prohibition Order to be recommended without provision for a review period.

Decision and reasons on behalf of the Secretary of State I have considered the panel’s findings and recommendations. The facts have been found and indeed Mr Farquharson has agreed those facts. Those facts amount to unacceptable professional conduct and conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute.

This case involves serious findings of Mr Farquharson having a sexual relationship with a vulnerable student. Such behaviour could seriously weaken public confidence in the profession. Whilst the panel noted Mr Farquharson’s previous good character, it was concerned with the lack of insight and remorse shown.

In all the circumstances I agree that a prohibition order without the provision for a review period is both appropriate and proportionate.



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 10 (2011) 211–225 brill.nl/lape From ICSID Annulment to Appeal Half Way Down the Slippery Slope* Christoph Schreuer Of Counsel, Wolf Theiss, Vienna, Austria Abstract Annulment under the ICSID Convention offers a limited remedy on the basis of a few carefully circumscribed grounds. Recently, losing parties have attacked awards for a wide array of reasons. Some ad hoc committees deciding these requests for annulment have taken a broad...»

«389IVZ.fm Seite V Mittwoch, 2. März 2005 3:55 15 Inhalt Vorwort............................................................. XI Teil 1: FAQ Die GPL und Freie Software............................................... 1 Was ist die GPL?..................................................... 1 Wie unterscheidet sich die GPL von anderen Open...»

«1 of 10 [9.06] Room Full of Heroes Room Full of Heroes Written by Eric Zicklin Directed by Wil Shriner ===================================================================== Production Code: 9.06 Episode Number In Production Order: 195 Episode Filmed on: August 28th, 2001 Original Airdate on NBC: October 30th, 2001 Transcript written on November 4th, 2001 AWARDS & NOMINATIONS Nominated YOUNG ARTISTS AWARDS • Best Performance in a Television Series – Guest Starring Young Actor: Steven Anthony...»

«God, Arabs, and Jews, 7 CHAPTER 4 AMENS of Romans1 1. Or the Bible on Arabs, Jews, and Mormons, about the 3 great religions of today, Islam, Mormonism, and Judaism; of course other than of Christianity, the religion of the only Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, both blessed forever, Amen. Blessed to hear of Messianic Jews in Israel, from David Lazarus, a journalist and pastor of a congregation of Messianic Jews in Tel Aviv, and then read as he describes Christian meetings with the Arab...»

«Mock Trial U.S. v. Michael Davis A college student is charged with felony rape after his girlfriend alleges that he forced her to have sexual intercourse against her will. (This is an updated version of U.S. v. David Jones) Developed by the D.C. Street Law Clinic at Georgetown University Law Center Distributed by Street Law, Inc. This trial may be used and duplicated for non-commercial academic use. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF NEW COLUMBIA -x : United States : : : -v: Civil Case...»

«AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION Transcending Sovereignty: Enforcement of Annulled International Arbitration Awards The Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards Annulled In Their Country Of Origin: The French Approach Vanessa Benichou King & Spalding, Paris « International commercial arbitration is like a bird trying to fly; it rises in the air but from time to time falls back upon its home nest. The young bird is however growing up quickly. In many cases international arbitration can spread...»

«Aalborg Universitet 'Kommunikalsk' samspil i musikterapi Holck, Ulla Publication date: Document Version Tidlig version også kaldet pre-print Link to publication from Aalborg University Citation for published version (APA): Holck, U. (2002). 'Kommunikalsk' samspil i musikterapi: kvalitative videoanalyser af musikalske og gestiske interaktioner med børn med betydelige funktionsnedsættelser, herunder børn med autisme. Institut for Musik og Musikterapi, Aalborg Universitet. General rights...»

«January 2013 Term FILED June 17, 2013 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 12-0195 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA _ LAWYER DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING LICENSE ANNULLED _ Submitted: June 4, 2013 Filed: June 17, 2013 Andrea J. Hinerman, Esq. George A. Daugherty, Esq. Senior Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel Dunbar, West Virginia Office of Disciplinary Counsel Attorney for Respondent Charleston, West Virginia Attorney for Petitioner The Opinion of the Court was delivered PER...»

«R. Eugene Jackson Big Dog Publishing The Emperor’s Hot New Duds! Copyright © 2015, R. Eugene Jackson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Emperor’s Hot New Duds! is fully protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America, and all of the countries covered by the Universal Copyright Convention and countries with which the United States has bilateral copyright relations including Canada, Mexico, Australia, and all nations of the United Kingdom. Copying or reproducing all or any part of...»

«Officers’ Paper Model Spent Convictions Bill Draft consultation paper Background The Standing Committee of Attorneys-General is working on a project to design a national model Bill for a spent-convictions scheme. A spent-convictions scheme provides for certain criminal convictions to be disregarded, for most purposes, after a sufficient period of good behaviour. All Australian jurisdictions except Victoria and South Australia already have such schemes, and New Zealand has one, but the...»

«Stichproben. Wiener Zeitschrift für kritische Afrikastudien Nr. 12/2007, 7. Jg. The Colonial “Emancipation” of Algerian Women: the Marriage Law of 1959 and the Failure of Legislation on Women’s Rights in the Post-Independence Era Neil MacMaster Abstract The failure of the newly independent Algerian state, after a long war of decolonization in which women played a major role, to introduce progressive reform to women’s legal, and thus social, status is widely recognized. The article...»

«T.C. Memo. 2005-127 UNITED STATES TAX COURT DAVID TAYLOR ENTERPRISES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 7698-03. Filed May 31, 2005. Lawrence Sherlock and Juan F. Vasquez, Jr., for petitioner. Derek B. Matta, for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION KROUPA, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies of $431,1141 for 19992 and $113,390 for 2000 in petitioner’s Federal income taxes. The issue to be decided is whether losses...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.abstract.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Abstract, dissertation, book

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.