WWW.ABSTRACT.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstract, dissertation, book
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 7 |

«John S. Jacob, Ph.D. Ricardo Lopez, M.S. Heather Biggs, M.S. Texas Coastal Watershed Program Texas Sea Grant/ Texas Cooperative Extension The Texas ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Anticipated Local Response to Sea Level Rise Along

the Texas Coast:

A First Approximation

John S. Jacob, Ph.D.

Ricardo Lopez, M.S.

Heather Biggs, M.S.

Texas Coastal Watershed Program

Texas Sea Grant/ Texas Cooperative Extension

The Texas A&M University System

December 20, 2007

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGURES

INTRODUCTION

CONTROLLING LEGAL ISSUES FOR SEA LEVEL RISE RESPONSE IN TEXAS............. 8 COUNTY DESCRIPTIONS

ORANGE COUNTY

JEFFERSON COUNTY

CHAMBERS COUNTY

GALVESTON COUNTY

HARRIS COUNTY

BRAZORIA COUNTY

MATAGORDA COUNTY

JACKSON COUNTY

CALHOUN COUNTY

REFUGIO COUNTY

ARANSAS COUNTY

SAN PATRICIO COUNTY

NUECES COUNTY

KLEBERG COUNTY

KENEDY COUNTY

WILLACY COUNTY

CAMERON COUNTY

APPENDIX A: GEO-SPATIAL PROCESSING

GEO-SPATIAL PROCESSING

DATA SOURCES

APPENDIX B: METADATA

1. SLRR EXISTING DEVELOPMENT FOR TEXAS COASTAL STATES................. 56

2. SLRR NEW DEVELOPMENT FOR TEXAS COASTAL STATES 2007-2040....... 63

3. SLRR STUDY AREA

List of Tables

1. Public and private landowner classifications

2. Summary of GIS data applied in study

3. Population Growth in Texas Coastal Counties, 2005-2040

4. Informants List of Figures

1. Map of Project Study Area

2. Schematic of Legal Controls on Development on Gulf and Bayside Shorelines

3. Map of Projected Population Increase from 2005 to 2040

4. Sea Level Rise Response in Orange County

5. Sea Level Rise Response in Jefferson County

6. Sea Level Rise Response in Chambers County

7. Sea Level Rise Response in Harris County

8. Sea Level Rise Response in Galveston County

9. Sea Level Rise Response in Brazoria County

10. Sea Level Rise Response in Matagorda County

11. Sea Level Rise Response in Jackson County

12. Sea Level Rise Response in Calhoun County

13. Sea Level Rise Response in Refugio County

14. Sea Level Rise Response in Aransas County

15. Sea Level Rise Response in San Patricio County

16. Sea Level Rise Response in Nueces County

17. Sea Level Rise Response in Kleberg County

18. Sea Level Rise Response in Kenedy County

19. Sea Level Rise Response in Willacy County

20. Sea Level Rise Response in Cameron County

INTRODUCTION

This report was prepared under contract to Industrial Economics, Inc., in consultation with Jim Titus of the EPA. The purpose of this project was to prepare a set of maps

showing anticipated local response to sea level rise in 17 Texas Coastal Counties:

Jefferson, Orange, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, Brazoria, Matagorda, Jackson, Calhoun, Refugio, Aransas, San Patricio, Nueces, Kleberg, Kenedy, Willacy, and Cameron. This report is part of a national effort on the part of the Environmental Protection Agency to begin a national assessment of the impacts of sea level rise and to begin to encourage long-term thinking and planning for sea level rise by local officials.

The maps presented here are based on extensive conversations with local experts as well as our own local knowledge (particularly in Galveston Bay region counties).

The principal assumption of this report is that people will protect developed areas along threatened shorelines. We make no assumptions as to the degree of effort that people might make, nor as to the effectiveness of their efforts. Our maps show where these efforts can be expected to take place in the next 20-30 years. There can be little doubt that greater or lesser efforts will be made as sea level rises, and difficult choices have to be made. The maps in this report basically assume that if resources were sufficient, all of the indicated areas where protection is certain or likely would have a substantial protection effort.

In order to represent the areas that would mostly likely be affected by sea level rise, a

mask for the study area was created. Two main components for the study area include:

1. Elevation: Less or equal to 20 feet (6.096 m)

2. Shoreline Buffer: Less or equal to 1000 feet. The buffer was used to complement the first criterion (elevation) in shoreline areas with high elevation values where otherwise only a very small strip would be shown.

The following categories, laid out by Industrial Economics and the EPA, were used for

this project:

1. Shore Protection Almost Certain: Any currently developed areas, including areas of somewhat spotty development, where we assume that the whole area would be subject to protection. We used no strict rule or protocol to make this determination.

Certainly if an area had 50% or more development, we would categorize the entire area as Almost Certain. But many areas of significantly less than 50% development were also categorized as almost certain protection. If substantial infrastructure (especially roads) were already in place, then it seemed obvious to us that protection would occur in the entire area.

Within this category we also included areas not yet developed, but that are already slated for development, or where there is good agreement that development is ―imminent‖. The printed maps delivered with this project show a single ―Almost Certain‖ category, but information on existing and yet-to-be-developed areas is preserved within the GIS shapefiles associated with this project.





2. Shore Protection Likely: Areas forecast to be developed within the next 30 or so years, and not within currently developed or very soon-to-be-developed areas. The current map is based on personal and expert knowledge of areas undergoing development and corridors that will likely see development in the future.

We did not include areas that were excluded from insurance under the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) in this category. Many of these areas are already protected as state parks (e.g., Matagorda Island and Mustang Island State Parks).

The non-state park CBRA areas theoretically could be developed by self-insured developers with deep pockets, but our informants did not think this was likely within the time frame of this report.

3. Shore Protection Unlikely: All croplands, rangelands, and woodlands that are not wetlands or areas otherwise shielded from development. No development is foreseen for these areas.

4. Wetlands. Wetlands from the NWI maps (1993). These include both palustrine, estuarine, and lacustrine wetlands. We excluded diked, excavated, and farmed wetlands. The printed maps do not differentiate between palustrine and estuarine wetlands, but the information is preserved in the digital GIS associated with this project.

5. Conservation Lands. Known conservation areas with permanent or long term (+100 yrs) easements. Most of these areas probably would not be subject to protection against sea level rise.

Table 1. Public and Private landowner classifications

–  –  –

Figure 1: Project Study Area

CONTROLLING LEGAL ISSUES FOR SEA LEVEL RISE RESPONSE IN TEXAS

After market forces, the next largest controlling factor of where development will go is the law, i.e., where can one legally build? The focus of this section is on laws and regulations that control or limit development near the shoreline.

The major state controlling laws for development in Texas coastal areas are the Open Beach Law (Title 12, Section 61), the Coastal Public Lands Management Act (Title 12, Section 33), and the Dune Protection Act (Title 2, Subtitle E, Chapter 63). The major federal controlling law is Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and to a lesser extent Section 404 of Clean Water Act. Figure 1 graphically displays the spatial controls of these laws. There are no state wetland laws of any significance.

The State of Texas has exclusive control over state lands. The most important category of state lands in the coastal zone is ―submerged lands‖, defined as lands within tidewater limits (§33.004). Within these lands, the State, through the Texas General Land Office, can control any construction or significant land modification. The state rarely cedes complete control of its lands; the applicant or potential user of the land must obtain a lease or an easement from the state.

Submerged coastal lands in Texas are also governed by Section 10 of the federal Rivers and Harbors Act. The submerged lands are owned by the State of Texas, but are also considered ―waters of the U.S.‖ Because most of the submerged lands are owned by the State of Texas, relatively few development projects are likely to occur directly on these lands. But permits can be obtained for piers, jetties, bulkheads, etc, that impinge on these waters, and it is unusual that one or another of these structures is not present where development occurs adjacent to these waters or submerged lands. For these kinds of developments, an easement or lease from the General Land Office must be obtained as well as Section 10 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Through the Open Beaches Act, additional state control above the mean high tide is extended to the vegetation line on beaches fronting the Gulf of Mexico, even though these lands are for the most part privately owned. In addition, critical dune areas behind the vegetation line on the Gulf of Mexico are subject to additional protection through the Dune Protection Act. All dunes on Gulf-of-Mexico-fronting shorelines are considered to be ―critical‖.

Although the Gulf of Mexico beaches are theoretically well protected against development through the Open Beaches Act, the private lands adjacent to these beaches are subject to intense development pressure. The prohibition against development on private lands between the mean high tide and the line of vegetation (LV) is well established in state law. Landward of the LV, the state Dune Protection Act (Natural Resources Code, Chapter 63) requires that local governments establish a dune protection plan, and most of these require a minimum setback landward of the LV. The dunes landward of the LV usually have some kind of protection, but development on them can and does occur under permit conditions of ―no net loss‖.

The use of the Line of Vegetation, as the landward line of public access and state control, means that the state essentially has a ―rolling easement‖ on these lands, given that the line is subject to change from storms and sea level rise. Sellers are in fact required to notify potential buyers of property fronting the Gulf of Mexico of the potentially changing line.

Gulf of Mexico beach-front development cannot legally be protected from erosion by armoring, except under a few exemptions. The rolling easement and prohibition against armoring does not mean that landowners cannot undertake protective measures. Beach nourishment is allowed and in fact encouraged along most of the coast, as long as it follows the stipulations of the state Coastal Erosion Protection and Recovery Act.

Structural methods such as sand-filled geotubes are also allowed under current interpretation of state law. Where these geotubes are in place, they have become the effective LV (Ray Newby, TXGLO, personal communication). It remains to be seen how interpretations will change if a major storm effectively moves the LV landward of existing geotubes. If geotubes are used, then the landowners are also required to maintain the existing beach width through nourishment.

The bottom line for this area of Texas is that development is likely to occur near the Gulf shoreline for the foreseeable future as long as federal flood and state wind and hail insurance can be obtained. The only areas where this insurance is not available are in areas governed by the federal Coastal Barriers Resource Act (CBRA).

On bayside shorelines, there is no guaranteed public access or state control above the mean high tide line. Marina developments will continue to occur on bayside properties, and easements will be granted to dig canals through submerged lands to open bay waters, but relatively little development is likely to occur in Section 10 estuarine wetlands/ submerged lands of Texas because both a Section 10 permit is required as well as a lease or easement from the state. Development adjacent to these lands can occur with little or no restrictions. Bulkheads can be built just adjacent to submerged lands without a permit as long as they are just inside the upland line.

Section 404 of the Clean Water Act theoretically prohibits development in wetlands other than those covered by Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, but permits are generally easier to obtain for inland wetlands than for estuarine wetlands.

Figure 2. Schematic of Legal Controls on Development on Gulf and Bayside Shorelines

COUNTY DESCRIPTIONS

The majority of the Texas coastal counties are increasing in population. Over 6 million more people are expected to move to the Texas Coast over the next 30 years. This is over twice the current amount. Kenedy county, where the majority of the land is primary owned by the Kenedy and King Ranches, is the only county that is expected to decrease in population. A brief description of the growth patterns as well as the current land uses for each of the coastal counties is explained in the county summaries below.

Table 3 and Figure 3 depict the percent of change as well as the increase of population within each county between 2005 and 2040. The maps corresponding to each county description demonstrate the categories outlined by Industrial Economics and the EPA mentioned earlier in this report.

Table 3. Projected Population Growth in Texas Coastal Counties

–  –  –

Figure 3: Map of the Projected Population Increase from 2005 to 2040 (Harris County increase not to scale) Source: Derived from Texas State Data Center and Office of the State Demographer, Data from the Texas State Demographer’s Office. Accessed October 2007.

http://txsdc.utsa.edu/

ORANGE COUNTY



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 7 |


Similar works:

«NATURSCHUTZ UND VERFASSUNGSRECHT Prof Dr D Czybulka 1 Einführung 1.1 Naturschutz und Schutz der natürlichen Lebensgrundlagen in der Rechtssprache In den Verfassungen des Bundes und der Länder wird der Begriff Naturschutz anders als in den Naturschutzgesetzen, dem sogenannten einfachen Recht außer in der Kompetenzvorschrift des Art. 75 Abs. 1 Nr. 3 des Grundgesetzes (GG) nicht ausdrücklich verwendet. Der Naturschutz wird im Verfassungsrecht zumeist als Schutz der natürlichen...»

«FAQS Who can enter into a civil union? Any person over the age of 18 may enter in a civil union with his/her partner if the person is single, divorced, had his/her previous marriage annulled or is a widow or widower. Persons between the age of 16 and 18 require the consent of their parents to contract a civil union. My partner and I reside in Malta. What do my partner and I have to do to legally contract a civil union in Malta? If you and your partner reside in Malta and wish to contract a...»

«Diskussionsbeiträge aus dem Volkswirtschaftlichen Seminar der Universität Göttingen Beitrag Nr. 113 Corrupt Relational Contracting Johann Graf Lambsdorff, Sitki Utku Teksoz, Mai 2002 Volkswirtschaftliches Seminar, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 3, D-37073 Göttingen Corrupt Relational Contracting J. Graf Lambsdorff and S.U.Teksoz∗ Abstract Because corruption must be hidden from the public and is not enforced by courts it entails transaction costs, which are larger than those from legal...»

«TSACHI KEREN-PAZ Risks and Wrongs’ Account of Corrective Justice in Tort Law: Too much or Too Little? ABSTRACT In this paper I make two sets of comments about Coleman’s analysis of tort law in Risks and Wrongs. First, I highlight the limited role of corrective justice (CJ) in explaining tort liability and the role of other considerations. Here my account is partially compatible with Coleman’s. At time it develops existing themes; at other times it completes his account by referring to...»

«Lärmaktionsplanung der Stadt Garbsen Abschlussbericht LDEN bzw. LTag in dB(A) Februar 2010 Berlin Novalisstraße 10 D-10115 Berlin-Mitte Tel: 030 / 322 95 25 30 Fax: 030 / 322 95 25 55 email: berlin@LK-argus.de www.LK-argus.de in Zusammenarbeit mit konsalt Akustische Berechnungen Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung Lärmaktionsplanung der Stadt Garbsen Abschlussbericht Bearbeitung: Dipl.-Ing. Jana Lawinczak LK Argus GmbH Dipl.-Ing. Sibylle Rath LK Argus GmbH Dr.-Ing. Eckhart Heinrichs LK Argus GmbH...»

«Anglo-Catholicism in Antebellum North Carolina: Levi Silliman Ives and the Society of the Holy Cross By Lewis Wright He has instituted at Valle Crucis a monastic order... composed of persons bound to him by a vow of celibacy, poverty and obedience.... He has given to the members, as their peculiar dress, a black cassock extending from the throat to the ankle.... He allows to be placed on the altar a pyx, in which are reserved the remaining consecrated elements after a communion......»

«IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2014 Term FILED _ November 25, 2014 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 11-0728 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS _ OF WEST VIRGINIA LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Petitioner v. JOHN C. SCOTCHEL, JR., Respondent Lawyer Disciplinary Proceeding No. 11-0728 LAW LICENSE ANNULLED AND OTHER SANCTIONS Submitted: September 9, 2014 Filed: November 25, 2014 Jessica H. Donahue Rhodes, Esq. J. Michael Benninger, Esq. Office of Disciplinary...»

«Copyright by Laresh Krishna Jayasanker The Dissertation Committee for Laresh Krishna Jayasanker Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Sameness in Diversity: Food Culture and Globalization in the San Francisco Bay Area and America, 1965-2005 Committee: Neil Foley, Supervisor Elizabeth Engelhardt Mark Lawrence James McWilliams David Oshinsky Sameness in Diversity: Food Culture and Globalization in the San Francisco Bay Area and America, 1965-2005 by Laresh...»

«LINCOLN PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT SUMMER EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES Applications may be picked up after January 2, 2014, at the Department of Parks and Recreation, 2740 A Street. Applications are also available on the City of Lincoln website at http://lincoln.ne.gov/city/parks/About/employment.htm. All applications must be returned to the Parks and Recreation Office at 2740 ‘A’ Street, 68502, unless otherwise noted. Applications received by March 3, 2014, will be given preference. In...»

«Écranosphère n° 2 (hiver 2015) The Inception of Cynicism from the Ruins of Sexual Difference: Christopher Nolan’s Dialectic of Masculine Enlightenment Tamas Nagypal York University Résumé/Abstract This paper maps the antagonism of two subject positions, in Christopher Nolan’s Inception, that mediate the contradictions of the film’s late capitalist universe. Drawing on the Lacanian formulas of sexuation, it argues that the femme fatale, Mal, has a relation to the social symbolic order...»

«Roman Catholic Church of Saint Aidan 505 Willis Avenue, Williston Park, New York 11596 516-746-6585 516-746-6055 (Fax) The Salvation of Souls is the Supreme Law Mission Statement We, the parish family of the Church of Saint Aidan, strengthened by the Eucharist and encouraged by the Word of God, welcome all, for we recognize that everyone is a child of God and no one should be excluded. Guided by the Holy Spirit through prayer, we strive as one to build the Body of Christ. We commit ourselves to...»

«Dr.-Ing. Dieter Holzdeppe Particle Flow Erosion at Ventilator Components Basic Principles of Erosion and Materials/Coatings Resistant against Particle Flow Erosion TLT-Turbo GmbH December 2015 This publication was carefully written and its content reviewed to correctness. However, mistakes cannot be excluded. The TLT-Turbo GmbH and the author do not take any juridical responsibility for false and incomplete statements/information and for resulting implications and any liability is excluded. The...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.abstract.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Abstract, dissertation, book

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.