WWW.ABSTRACT.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstract, dissertation, book
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 |

«JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ANTHROPOLOGY RESEARCH ARTICLE VOLUME II 2011 ISSUE 1 On the Antiquity of Trisomy 21: Moving Towards a Quantitative Diagnosis ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

ISSN 2150-3311

JOURNAL OF

CONTEMPORARY ANTHROPOLOGY

RESEARCH ARTICLE

VOLUME II 2011 ISSUE 1

On the Antiquity of Trisomy 21:

Moving Towards a Quantitative Diagnosis of Down Syndrome

in Historic Material Culture

John M. Starbuck

Ph.D. Candidate Department of Anthropology The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania Copyright © John M. Starbuck

On the Antiquity of Trisomy 21:

Moving Towards a Quantitative Diagnosis of Down Syndrome in Historic Material Culture John M. Starbuck Ph.D. Candidate Department of Anthropology The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania

ABSTRACT

Down syndrome was first medically described as a separate condition from other forms of cognitive impairment in 1866. Because it took so long for Down syndrome to be recognized as a clinical entity deserving its own status, several investigators have questioned whether or not Down syndrome was ever recognized before 1866. Few cases of ancient skeletal remains have been documented to have Down syndrome-like characteristics. However, several forms of material culture may depict this condition. Within this paper the history of our understanding of Down syndrome is discussed. Both skeletal remains and different forms of material culture that may depict Down syndrome are described, and where relevant, debates within the literature about how likely such qualitative diagnoses are to be correct are also discussed. Suggestions are then made for ways in which a quantitative diagnosis can be made to either strengthen or weaken qualitative arguments for or against the diagnosis of Down syndrome in different forms of historic material culture.

Starbuck: On the Antiquity of Trisomy 21 19

INTRODUCTION

Down syndrome was first described in the medical literature by John Langdon Down in

1866. During this era individuals with cognitive impairment (i.e. mental retardation) were often referred to as ―idiots‖ and ―imbeciles‖ and rarely differentiated into subcategories based upon differential diagnoses. Using a hierarchical racial classification system that was popular during his age, John Langdon Down noted the resemblance of facial features among individuals with Down syndrome and individuals of Mongolian descent (Down 1866; Volpe 1986). Down also noted the characteristic facial appearance and shared phenotypic features of unrelated individuals with Down syndrome in the following: ―[…] when placed side by side, it is difficult to believe that the specimens compared are not children of the same parents‖ (Down 1866: 260). Based upon these observations Down determined that individuals with Down syndrome differed from other types of individuals with cognitive impairment and labeled these individuals as ―Mongolian idiots‖ or ―mongoloids‖ (Down 1866:260-261). Although other authors (e.g.

Esquirol and Seguin as cited in Stratford 1996: 3-4) may have described individuals with Down syndrome before Down’s publication in 1866, Down is credited with being the first person to group together individuals with Down syndrome based upon their phenotypic similarities to define a subcategory of individuals with cognitive impairment (Megarbane et al. 2009; Stratford 1996; Pueschel 2000).

The hierarchical racial ladder of Down’s era viewed the races of mankind as being fixed and definite, with Caucasians being superior to all other races and Mongolians being at the bottom of the ladder (Volpe 1986). Although Down’s ―Mongolian idiot‖ and ―mongoloid‖ labels would be viewed as racist today, the use of these terms was a consequence of the prevailing ideas of racial hierarchies from his era (Volpe 1986). By combining this interpretative framework with his phenotypic observations of individuals with Down syndrome, Down made an argument for the ―unity of the human species‖ (Down 1866). Down reasoned that if a disease can break down supposedly ―fixed‖ racial barriers by producing a Mongolian-like child from non-Mongolian parents, then the racial categories of mankind are likely not fixed at all and quite variable (Down, 1866:262). This was an unpopular opinion at the time of Down’s publication. Interestingly, if Down had not favored this hierarchical racial classification system for understanding differences between individuals with cognitive impairment, it is likely that it would have taken much longer for medical scientists to classify Down syndrome as different from other forms of cognitive impairment.

After Down’s classification of Down syndrome many investigators attempted to document exactly how individuals with this condition differ. Several studies have determined that individuals with Down syndrome differ phenotypically from individuals who do not have Down syndrome in many ways. General differences include the following: almond-shaped eyes (Shuttleworth 1886; Oliver 1891), oblique palpebral fissures (Muir 1903), an open-mouthed facial posture that may include a protruding tongue, broad and stocky necks, obesity (Pueschel 2000), short, broad, and small hands and feet (Fraser and Mitchell 1876-7; Chumlea et al. 1979), hands may have a simian palmar crease (Hall 1966), inward curving little fingers (Smith 1896;





Muir 1903), a wide space between first and second toes (Pueschel 2000:55), and a high frequency congenital heart defects (Garrod 1898). Before karyotyping was possible, individuals with Down syndrome were usually diagnosed based upon differences in craniofacial characteristics. Osseous craniofacial differences include the following: brachycephalic-shaped heads (Fraser and Mitchell 1876-7) small or absent nasal bones (Jones1890; Greig 1927a), an underdeveloped mandible and maxilla (Benda 1941), flat or concave midfaces (Greig 1927b), 20 Journal of Contemporary Anthropology Vol. II (2011), Iss. 1 poor or absent sinus development (Spitzer and Robinson 1955; Roche et al. 1961), smaller palates (Redman et al. 1966), poor or absent tooth morphogenesis and highly variable tooth eruption sequences (Jones 1890; Greig 1927b; Townsend 1987), and reduced rates of craniofacial growth overall (O’Riordan and Walker 1978; von Hofe 1922). Soft-tissue craniofacial differences include the following: prominent forehead (Volpe 1986), epicanthic folds (Shuttleworth 1886; Oliver 1891), a flat or depressed nasal bridge, upturned nose (Jones1890; Greig 1927a), midfacial hypoplasia (Kisling 1966; Frostad et al. 1971), small mouth (Pueschel 2000), folded over upper helix of ear (Hall 1966), poor craniofacial musculature differentiation (Bersu1980), reduced overall facial size (Benda 1941), and a relatively short face (Gollesz 1961) that can be square-like when viewed anteriorly (Fraser and Mitchell 1876-7).

These lists are by no means exhaustive. The facial phenotype exhibited depends on genetic background, type of chromosomal abnormality causing Down syndrome (e.g. non-disjunction, translocation, or mosaicism), age, and sex (Pueschel 2000). The overwhelming consensus is that the craniofacial phenotype of Down syndrome always shows some degree of facial dysmorphology; however, no single phenotypic difference is always present (Pueschel 2000).

In 1959 LeJeune discovered that an extra copy of human chromosome 21 (i.e. trisomy

21) causes Down syndrome (LeJeune et al. 1959); however, Waardenburg inferred this in 1932 (Allen 1974). Chromosome 21 contains about 1.5% of the human genome and has an estimated 300-400 protein coding genes (Gardiner et al. 2003; Hattori et al. 2000; Megarbane et al. 2009).

Specifically, the Down syndrome genotype can occur from nondisjunction, translocation, and mosaicism; however, nondisjunction is by far the most frequent cause of Down syndrome (~95%) (Fisher 1983; Hassold et al. 1993). Trisomy 21 is responsible for causing the abovementioned phenotypic differences by causing a gene-dosage imbalance that disrupts development.

Genetic lines of evidence indicate that the ancestral human chromosome 21 arose 30-50 mya (Richard and Dutrillaux 1998). Interestingly, the condition of trisomy 21 is not limited to humans. In non-human apes chromosome 22 is analogous to human chromosome 21. Humans have two less chromosomes than our ape cousins because of a chromosomal fusion that occurred several million years ago to produce human chromosome 2 (Kasai et al. 2000; Wienberg et al.

1994; Yunis and Prakash 1982). Trisomy 22 is the genetic equivalent of Down syndrome in apes and has been reported in both a chimpanzee (McClure et al. 1969) and orangutan (Andrle, 1979).

Taken together, these lines of evidence indicate that trisomy 21 has an incredibly long history in the primate lineage.

Today we know that Down syndrome is found in all ethnic backgrounds and socioeconomic statuses at a frequency of about 1:700 (Kuppermann et al. 2006; CDCP 2006). A marked maternal age effect has also been noted (von Hofe 1922; Penrose 1951; Hook 1989). On average more than 700 Down syndrome children are born each day worldwide and more than 255,000 individuals with Down syndrome are born each year. Due to improved healthcare, the life expectancy for individuals with Down syndrome has consistently risen from 9 years in 1900, to 30 years in the 1960’s, and to more than 50 years today (Collman and Stoller 1962;

Megarbane et al. 2009), which has resulted in an increase in prevalence (Einfeld and Brown 2010). However, the average lifespan of 9 years in 1900 may have been skewed due to a cultural tendency to institutionalize cognitively impaired individuals during this time period combined with the poor living conditions and developmental outcomes associated with many of these institutions (Stimson et al. 1968; Kugel 1961). It is possible that in some cultures individuals Starbuck: On the Antiquity of Trisomy 21 21 with Down syndrome who did not have severe health problems may have enjoyed a higher average lifespan (Stratford 1982:250-254).

There is debate within the literature about the age of Down syndrome as a condition affecting mankind. Down syndrome is the most common live-born aneuploid condition in humans; however, this condition was not described medically until 1866 (Down 1866). The high prevalence of Down syndrome relative to other genetic anomalies and the length of time it took for this condition to be described medically has caused some authors to question whether or not Down syndrome is a relatively old or new condition in humans (Mirkinson 1968; Volpe 1986).

However, Pueschel (2000:11) provides three reasons for why Down syndrome was not recognized as a clinical entity before 1866: 1) prior to the 19th century few physicians were interested in children with developmental disabilities, 2) many diseases and disorders were more prevalent then, which would have overshadowed the occurrence of Down syndrome, and 3) at this time period only half of the female population survived past the age of 35, which would reduce the number of late aged pregnancies that are more likely to produce a child with Down syndrome. Furthermore, Richards (1968: 353-354) pointed out that population size, population age-structure, and infant mortality probably heavily influenced the prevalence (i.e. number of babies surviving) of Down syndrome and precluded medical science from recognizing this condition earlier. However, medical conditions have frequently been identified in historical material culture (Salter 2008). Phenotypically- and historically-speaking the condition of Down syndrome may be represented in skeletal material and several forms of material culture from various populations that are both spatially and temporally discrete. Within this paper I provide an extensive list and description of skeletal remains and material culture that may depict Down syndrome (Appendix A) and, where relevant, I discuss debates within the literature about how likely such qualitative diagnoses are to be correct. I then make suggestions for ways in which a quantitative diagnosis can be made to either strengthen or weaken the qualitative arguments for or against the diagnosis of Down syndrome in historic material culture.

SKELETAL MATERIAL

SRI-3 skeletal remains (circa 5200 B.C.) Walker and colleagues (1991) published an

Abstract

on 7200 year old skeletal remains (SRI-3) from Santa Rosa Island, CA, which were found in a Native American cemetery. This

individual’s sex was estimated to be female. Cranial characteristics included the following:

metopism, very wide interorbital distances, a low and wide nasal aperture, reduced auricular height, a flat cranial base, small teeth, and a dysmorphic peg-shaped third molar. Overall, the dimensions of the mandible, palate, and cranial vault were similar to those of other SRI-3 females. Walker and researchers also recovered a femur, a fragmentary os coxa, and three cervical vertebrae (C1-C3), many of which were also unusually small. Walker and colleagues noted that several of these skeletal characteristics are consistent with those found in Down syndrome; however, given the lack of a representative skeletal collection of individuals with Down syndrome, this diagnosis was not conclusive. Unfortunately, Dr. Walker’s untimely passing has prevented more detailed publications about this individual, but Dr. Della C. Cook from Indiana University intends to publish further on these skeletal remains (personal communication). If this individual had Down syndrome it would be the oldest recorded and most complete historical skeletal material with this condition to date.

22 Journal of Contemporary Anthropology Vol. II (2011), Iss. 1 Tauberbischofsheim skull (circa 550 B.C.) Czarnetski and colleagues (2003) briefly describe 2550 year old craniofacial skeletal remains from a burial site at Tauberbischofsheim, Germany. This individual’s sex was estimated to be female, and she was estimated to be 18-20 years of age at the time of death. Unfortunately a detailed description of the skull was not provided. Also, while the authors provided a picture of a Down syndrome skull, it is not clear whether or not the picture provided is of the skull in question (Czarnetski et al. 2003).

–  –  –



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 |


Similar works:

«Modern Civic Art; or, the City Made Beautiful: Aesthetic Progressivism and the Allied Arts in Canada, 1889-1939 By Julie Nash A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Art History: Art and Its Institutions School For Studies in Art and Culture Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario ©2011 Julie Nash 1*1 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction...»

«Generaldirektion Externe Politikbereiche Direktion Regionen Referat Asien, Australien und Neuseeland Kurzinformation Vermerk für die Mitglieder des EP in der 8. Wahlperiode (2014-2019) über die Delegation für die Beziehungen zu Australien und Neuseeland Redaktionsschluss: 28.07.2014 DE DE FdR 1032376 DE PE 531.828 Delegation für die Beziehungen zu Australien und Neuseeland (DANZ) Australien -2FdR 1032376 DE PE 531.828 Neuseeland 1. Kurzer Abriss der Geschichte der Delegation Beziehungen der...»

«On sequential functionals of type 3 ∗ Dag Normann February 18, 2005 Abstract We show that the extensional ordering of the sequential functionals of pure type 3, e.g. as defined via game semantics [2, 4], is not cpo-enriched. This shows that this model does not equal Milner’s [9] fully Abstract model for P CF. 1 Introduction In [14], Scott defined the logic LCF, a logic for computable typed functionals. He constructed a“mathematical” model for LCF, a construction that led to the...»

«Jadwiga Zacharska Powstańcze epizody w prozie fabularnej Tadeusza Micińskiego Niepodległość i Pamięć 21/1-2 (45-46), 205-216 ARTYKUŁY NIEPODLEGŁOŚĆ I PAMIĘĆ 2014, nr 1-2 (45-46) Jadwiga Zacharska Powstańcze epizody w prozie fabularnej Tadeusza Micińskiego Słowa kluczowe epizod, doświadczenie indywidualne, element edukacji egzystencjalnej, perspektywa indywidualna, budzenie duszy narodu, materializacja wizji, nadczłowieczeństwo, konflikt etyczny, przymierze z ducha....»

«visita bundestag visita bundestag Berlin Reichstag Parlamento Alemão Diariamente realizam-se visitas Os alunos a partir do décimo ano podem conhecer o modo de funcionamento do parlamento alemão "Bundestag" através Käfer Dachgarten-Restaurant at the Käfer DACHGARTEN RESTAURANT has a truly unique location: On top of the historic Reichstag building in the very heart of Berlin. The German Bundestag has Deutscher Bundestag Mediathek Download | Freeware.de Deutscher Bundestag...»

«The War of Independence in South Kilkenny in History and Memory. Thesis submitted to the Centre for Irish Studies, School of Humanities, College of Arts, Social Sciences and Celtic Studies, National University of Ireland, Galway in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Irish Studies 31 August 2012 Table of Contents Abstract p. 4 List of appendices p. 5 Acknowledgements p. 6 Introduction p. 8 Chapter 1: Kilkenny and the War of Independence p. 12 Towards a New...»

«Ronald McIntyre, “Husserl and the Representational Theory of Mind,” Topoi 5 (1986), 101-113. Reprinted in Perspectives on Mind, ed. by Herbert R. Otto and James A. Tuedio (Boston: D. Reidel, 1988); also reprinted in Historical Foundations of Cognitive Science, ed. by J-C. Smith (Boston: Kluwer, 1990); also reprinted (trans. by J. Jazé) in Les Etudes Philosophiques, Phenomenologie et Psychologie Cognitive, (Presses Universitaires de France, 1991). Husserl and the Representational Theory of...»

«1 DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit „Der Weg zur Freiheit“. Eine sozio-historische Betrachtung des Wiener Aktionismus Verfasserin Anita Winkler angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, Dezember 2007 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 312 295 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Geschichte Betreuer: a.o. Univ. Prof. Dr. Franz X. Eder DANKSAGUNG An dieser Stelle möchte ich mich gerne bei all jenen Personen und Institutionen bedanken, die mich bei der...»

«How to TRiM away at Post Traumatic Stress Reactions: Traumatic Risk Management – Now and in the Future Neil Greenberg, Paul Cawkill, Cameron March and John Sharpley Background Numerous organisations, including the Armed Forces, routinely place their personnel into potentially traumatic environments. It is known that exposure to traumatic events can lead to the development of psychological distress, lowered morale and organisational difficulty. It follows that military personnel are at...»

«The Sex Lives of Austr alians the sex lives of austr alians a history frank bongiorno Published by Black Inc., an imprint of Schwartz Media Pty Ltd 37–39 Langridge Street Collingwood VIC 3066 Australia email: enquiries@blackincbooks.com http://www.blackincbooks.com Copyright © Frank Bongiorno 2012 A l l R igh t s R e se rv e d. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or trans­ mitted in any form by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying,...»

«Wilderness, Race, and African Americans: An Environmental History from Slavery to Jim Crow Michael Starkey Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Energy and Resources Group University of California, Berkeley Approved: Dr. Carolyn Merchant Date Professor, Environmental Science, Policy, and Management Approved: Dr. Jeff Romm Date Professor, Environmental Science, Policy, and Management Received by the Graduate Secretary: _ Jane Stahlhut...»

«Erin H. Kimmerle, Ph.D. Department of Anthropology, Office: 813-974-2138 University of South Florida Direct: 813-974-5139 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, SOC 107 Fax: 813-902-6555 Tampa, FL 33620-8100 Email: kimmerle@usf.edu Website: www.forensics.usf.edu EDUCATION: Ph.D. 2004, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Anthropology. Title: “Biological and Statistical Variation in Age Estimation from Pubic Symphyseal Morphology with Regard to Individual Identification and Demographic Profiling.” M.A. 1999,...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.abstract.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Abstract, dissertation, book

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.