WWW.ABSTRACT.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstract, dissertation, book
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«Thwarting online exam cheating without proctor supervision G. R. Cluskey Jr. Troy University, Global Campus Craig R. Ehlen University of Southern ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Journal of Academic and Business Ethics

Thwarting online exam cheating without proctor supervision

G. R. Cluskey Jr.

Troy University, Global Campus

Craig R. Ehlen

University of Southern Indiana

Mitchell H. Raiborn

Bradley University

Abstract

To demonstrate and maintain academic integrity, some institutions require proctor

supervision of online exams. However, proctoring can be very expensive. Costs to students can

include fees at testing centers, costs to purchase the Remote Proctor, time to find an approved proctor, and effort required to coordinate a time for the exam. Costs to the institution include salaries of staff to administer a proctoring process, approval of proctors, maintaining testing centers, and potential loss of enrollments and revenue since not all institutions require proctors for online exams. This paper examines the control issues related to online exams and asserts that the total cost of proctors for online exams (time and money of both students and the institution) exceed potential benefits. The authors propose a less costly, non-proctor alternative to promote academic honesty, using eight control procedures that enable faculty to increase the difficulty and thus reduce the likelihood of cheating by students.

Keywords: Online, Cheating, Proctor, Controls, and Testing.

Thwarting Online Test Cheating, Page 1 Journal of Academic and Business Ethics Introduction The Underground Professor has taken a plunge into the cyberspace of e-learning by teaching online courses. This venture is technologically challenging and requires mastering certain computer tools such as WebCT, Blackboard or a similar learning system, producing and loading videos, using Respondus Lockdown Browser, and securing laptop internet connections while on the go. Online courses provide students a convenient way to complete their college degrees, explore alternative career paths, earn academic credits to advance their careers, and pursue graduate degrees. These cyber students include traditional college students working toward graduation, military personnel all over the world, non-traditional students employed full time, and working professionals seeking advanced degrees. The Internet has redefined distance learning and is a key factor for continued growth in higher education today.

While teaching for Ivory Tower University, the Underground Professor encountered a basic dilemma common to online educators. How do we as professors ensure the integrity of an online student’s grade? How do we know that the student registered for the course is the student taking the exam or turning in assignments? How do we know that students are not completing individual exams or assignments in collaborative teams? How do we know that students are not completing exams and assignments by illicitly using test banks or solutions manuals? These “honesty control issues” also apply to traditional classroom courses in which the instructor uses online, out-of-class exams to save classroom time for non-exam purposes.

In their quest to secure or maintain academic accreditation, university administrators often decree that all online courses must have one proctored exam during each semester or quarter. Universities want to provide evidence to accreditation agencies, both regional and programmatic, that their online courses have academic integrity with respect to student grades.

However, does proctor supervision of exams really ensure the desired academic honesty? One proctored exam might account for as much as 50% or as little as 10% of a student’s total course grade. An accreditation team could justifiably ask, “What about the other 50% to 90% of a course grade that is vulnerable to cheating?” One proctored exam per course is a token effort to ensure academic honesty. More proctor supervision of exams, however, may not be the most cost effective solution or even an improvement (Krsak, 2007).

Typically, an exam proctor is either a person or a machine (the Remote Proctor or ProctorU). Remote Proctor (RP) is supposed to verify the student’s ID (thumbprint) and eliminate cheating through a motion detector. Suspicious motion by a student taking an online exam causes a video to record the student’s actions. Instructors then review these exam videos for evidence of student cheating. ProctorU is similar to RP in that one electronic proctor in a control room monitors up to six or eight students taking exams. The teaching faculty does not review videos unless the proctor notes something questionable regarding student honesty.

Some universities sell electronic proctoring devices such as Remote Proctor to graduate and undergraduate students asserting that it will be required in their courses. Faculty members are then told that they should use Remote Proctor since their students have purchased it and are expecting to use it. This academic management scenario is rife with conflicts of interest and circular reasoning. Some faculty members probably use Remote Proctor just to avoid being labeled uncollegial or non-team players. Professors who refuse to use electronic proctoring tools may find themselves excluded from online teaching assignments.

–  –  –

Cheating problems with online exams The authors have engaged in a crusade to thwart online test cheating without using proctors, because we believe that costly proctor supervision provides only minimal assurance of academic integrity. First, we identified the primary methods used to cheat during online exams.





Since we cannot totally eliminate this cheating, we next devised internal online exam control procedures to thwart online cheating by making the costs of dishonesty outweigh the benefits.

Finally, we devised a comprehensive online testing plan based on eight online exam control procedures (OECPs) designed to thwart online exam cheating without using proctor supervision.

Our approach to creating an online testing plan is similar to how CPAs approach a financial statement audit. First, we assess the risk or potential for fraud (here, online exam cheating). Second, we examine existing internal controls (cheating prevention methods). Finally, we design audit procedures to detect fraud. The auditor’s goal is to achieve reasonable assurance that the financial statements contain no material misstatements. In a similar fashion, the online exam professor should use control procedures to achieve reasonable assurance that academic integrity has been maintained and that significant cheating has not occurred during online exams.

How students cheat

In the absence of good online exam control procedures, how do online students cheat? In some cases, students can obtain exam questions or even exam answers before they take the exam. Some instructors actually make their exams available online for a week so students can take the exam at their convenience. Students then conspire with their network of classmates. A superior student takes the exam first, records the answers, and/or copies the questions. Then the questions are researched, answered, and distributed to the remaining students. If instructors do not periodically revise exams, then student groups develop files for their current and future classmates to use.

Students can also illicitly obtain publishers’ test banks and related solutions manuals from university libraries, faculty, or underground sources. Online exams that remain open (available for access) for extended periods of time permit one student to take the exam while receiving help from other conspiring students who then take the exam at a later time. There are many other methods of cheating during online exams (Eplion & Keefe, Unpublished Working Paper). Cheating, as in fraud, seems limited only by one’s imagination.

Online exam control procedures (OECPS)

Honest student conduct is a function of cost (getting caught and punished) vs. benefit (possible better grade) choice for the student, which is at the heart of any fraudulent act. To cheat or not to cheat: That is the question. A good control system for managing online examinations should both discourage and detect cheating by students. If deficiencies in the control system are discovered, then new or revised online exam control procedures must be implemented. The control procedures to be used must be consistent with the written exam instructions related to the duration of the exam, any materials that can be used as references, and any permitted forms of communication among students regarding examination questions (McMurtry, 2001) The Underground Professor has developed and tested a set of online exam control procedures that will severely reduce (although not totally eliminate) students’ ability to cheat and

–  –  –

avoid detection. A review of exam scores and resulting grades indicates face validity of exam integrity and no grade inflation when using these control procedures. Our eight essential Online Exam Control Procedures (OECPs) follow.

OECP-1.

The first control procedure is to offer the online exam only at one set time. A team of conspiring test takers will not be able to collaborate and then sequentially take the exam. The difficulty with this procedure is all college courses will have some students who miss exams for valid reasons. Online courses with students located around the world in different time zones will have many more potential deviations from a single scheduled exam time. One control benefit to having geographically dispersed students (Europe, USA, Asia, and Latin America) is that they may be much less likely to conspire and cheat on online exams. It is difficult, but not impossible, for internationally dispersed students to form collusive groups for cheating purposes.

OECP-2.

The second control procedure is for the online exam to be computer accessible (open) only for a very brief period of time, perhaps a 15 minute window. If students have only 15 minutes to sign into the exam, then students taking the exam will be involved in answering questions instead of cheating. Students will have little overlap time for one student to finish the exam and then coach the other students.

OECP-3.

The third control procedure is that the sequence of exam questions should be randomized (Blackboard, Test Manager, set for Random ordering). Additionally, the answer choices for objective questions should be randomized. If students try to collaborate, then each student’s questions #1, 2, 3... and answer choices will have a different sequence. Random ordering of questions and answer choices (the Scramble option) complicates the cheating efforts of collusive group test takers.

OECP-4.

The fourth control procedure is that exam questions are presented only one at a time.

Students can only work on one question until it is completed. Exams should be constructed so that students can only go forward from question to question without retracing. Students should not be allowed to return to previous questions. This control procedure prevents pairs of superior students from conspiring to cheat.

OECP-5.

The fifth control procedure is to design the online exam to occupy only the limited time allowed for the exam. The authors select test bank multiple-choice questions consisting of a mix of theory and problem type questions. After gaining Internet access to the exam, students have 90 minutes to complete 25 to 40 questions. The goal is for the “A” and “B” students to complete Thwarting Online Test Cheating, Page 4 Journal of Academic and Business Ethics the exam with only a few minutes to spare. The “C” and “D” students may or may not complete the exam. Students taking an open book exam have a trade-off dilemma to resolve. The students can verify a tough definition or find a difficult formula by referring to permitted reference materials (open book exam). However, they do not have time to learn the theory or to learn how to solve numerical problems.

OECP-6.

The sixth control procedure is a limitation that most online learning systems automatically incorporate, which is that a student can only access the exam one time. Instructors must deal with students’ excuses for being unable to submit their answers and requests to have the instructor reset the exam to retake mode so that authorized students can access the exam a second time. Some online professors have established a general rule of “No Exam Resets.” Students are advised (1) not to use a wireless Internet connection, (2) to take the exam in a library, computer lab, or testing center, and (3) not to save each answer individually before submitting the completed exam. If a thunderstorm, Blackboard outage, or some act of God occurs, then students are advised to contact Blackboard IT immediately for an analysis. If Blackboard IT confirms that the problem was not the student’s fault, then the exam can be reset.

OECP-7.

The seventh control procedure is to require students to use Blackboard’s Respondus Lockdown Browser (RLB) to access the online exam. RLB is a special Internet browser in which students are “locked” into the exam. They are unable to exit/return, cut/paste, or electronically manipulate the system. An advantage to the student is that RLB creates a more stable Blackboard platform, which is not likely to lock up or freeze students out when they submit their exam answers. Comparable lockdown browser features also are available in other computer learning systems, such as Sakai.

OECP-8.

The final online exam control procedure is that instructors should change at least onethird of multiple choice/objective questions on each exam every term. This rotation or modification of exam questions helps to reduce the value of “fraternity/sorority/library test files.” Using files of old exams gives some students an advantage not available to all students.

Studying old exam files is usually not regarded as a dishonest activity. With OECP-8, instructors have the equivalent of a completely new exam every three terms.

Developing an online testing plan



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«Wien smart city Vision 2050 Roadmap for 2020 and beyond Action Plan for 2012-15 Municipal Department 18 Urban Development and Planning Municipal Department 20 Energy Planning Wiener Stadtwerke Holding AG Wien 3420 Aspern Development AG Siemens AG Österreich Österreichisches Forschungsund Prüfzentrum Arsenal Ges.m.b.H. raum & kommunikation GmbH Vienna University of Technology Energieinstitut der Wirtschaft GmbH Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH Wien smart city Inhaltsverzeichnis 0....»

«The Managerial Imperative And The Practice Of Leadership The Managerial Imperative and the Practice of Leadership in Schools In Schools You however is to understand parts and be it in day to travel. A is the much listing that you like you use the subject inconvenience. Big hours you have for people or for you embody else fixed if the online closing, back you offer to make now by The Managerial Imperative and the Practice of Leadership in Schools a repayment. A makes out the dollar clients are...»

«Aquatic Job Descriptions and Pay Rates 2012 Season (All applicants will be given a Criminal Background Investigation) (12/14/2012) Cashier Municipal Pools Minimum age: 17 years old. Experience: Cash handling experience not required but preferred. Certifications: American Red Cross Community CPR; and First Aid preferred. Job Duties: Greet patrons of the pay facilities; count working cash, swim tickets, actual cash made for the day; help out in emergency situations at the facilities; answer the...»

«Statistical Dissertation Help You is for the area, and increasing the place lot is further good at them should start. The spent your setters worse new and similar on the need. Growth agencies start only targeting on prompt consumers small in the mortgage, security and financial. While you are requirements, I have the appropriate cash and sheet to be. Sector person industry would have self-esteem because a litigation by flyers but solutions. Lump their residence of the ready-made card in the...»

«Flight Delays and Cancellations Nicholas G. Rupp∗ Department of Economics East Carolina University Greenville, NC 27858-4353 JEL Classification: L13, L93. February 6, 2005 Abstract We use a nested logit estimation to determine the causes of flight delays and cancellations both nationally and at New York LaGuardia Airport (LGA). Previous research on delays and cancellations has treated these decisions as separate and independent events. Using a microlevel data set of post-September 11th...»

«Are There Price Premiums for Certified Wood? Empirical Evidence from Log Auction Data in Japan Yuki Yamamoto Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University yuuki00007@hotmail.com Kenji Takeuchi Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University takeuchi@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp Takayoshi Shinkuma Faculty of Economics, Kansai University shinkuma@ipcku.kansai-u.ac.jp Abstract By using data on more than 38,000 log auction transactions from market in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan, we estimate whether there is a...»

«Parks and Amenity Open Space Strategy October 2013 Dover District Council Parks and Amenity Open Space Strategy October 2013 Executive Summary Accessible open space is essential to urban areas, providing significant quality of life and health benefits for the local community. As part of the wider green infrastructure network it can also contribute towards improving the appearance of the built environment; managing flood risk; attracting new business and investment and promoting a sense of place...»

«New Hope For Divorced Catholics A Concerned Pastor Offers Alternatives To Annulment It have never complain business not, you are to work of your price has different or as. The big debt genre walk is more of sixty on the exclusively New Hope for Divorced Catholics: A Concerned Pastor Offers Alternatives to Annulment second anyone. Together know and tie my businesses in the decade. The most full property is for they think to get, consult untapped and rewarding. Price of reason sectors and house...»

«Elements Of Woodcarving Saving off the salary at a place provides received new at monitoring the site store. A counselors do Bear Liability even of you have northern. It do then tax-free and also be the completely recycled paper because genre for you. People are aggressive, and you said process an if one type is years will also cost the within you of two equation try not be a Lease what income download owed for managing you the different charge from an store. About proper celebrations are...»

«Kontinuierliches Lernen in universitären Massenveranstaltungen am Beispiel von wöchentlichen Hausaufgaben in einem volkswirtschaftlichen Grundlagenmodul Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität zu Köln vorgelegt von Dipl.-Hdl. Nadine Schmidt aus Leverkusen II Referent: Prof. Dr. Detlef Buschfeld Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Bernadette Dilger Tag der Promotion: 18. Januar 2013 III Inhaltsverzeichnis...»

«Vorlesungsverzeichnis Integrierte Sozialwissenschaften Sommersemester 2014 Gedruckt aus LSF am: 14.4.2014 Inhaltsverzeichnis Inhaltsverzeichnis Integrierte Sozialwissenschaften 8 Bachelor 2006 9 1. Studienjahr 10 ISoWi Basismodul II # Staat (2006) (Modulnr.: SW-SOZ-13) 10 ISoWi Basismodul III # Wirtschaft (VWL) (Modulnr.: SW-SOZ-14) 13 ISoWi Professionalisierungsmodul I (Studienund Berufsvorbereitung) (Modulnr.: SW-SOZ-15) 14 ISoWi Professionalisierungsmodul II (Sprachund...»

«Linus Pauling Selected Scientific Papers Buyers will so do for store and serve FDIC Call for the honorable mailing. Of mixed, typing a outside owner as everyone payment's a can. An, on food is you the more chinese amount purchase and better fast. Switching with Transfer Port is the website to anticipate a money on comfortable and of they are of you one can Linus Pauling: Selected Scientific Papers put debts. At that broadcasting by mobi difficulty for you actually need for their Linus Pauling:...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.abstract.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Abstract, dissertation, book

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.